Home | Newsroom | About Us | Upcoming Events | FAQ | Contact | Blog | RSS RSS
 
 
 

FTB Legislative Update for Last Week

March 22nd, 2010

Assembly Bills

  • AB 1662 (Portantino/Jeffries) Disaster Loss Deduction/Excess Loss Carryover/August 2009 Los Angeles County Wildfires/January 2010 Los Angeles County Winter Storms – Amended 03/10/10
  • AB 1705 (Perez) Income Exclusion for Specified Energy Property Grants – Introduced 02/01/10 & Amended 03/08/10
  • AB 1735 (Harkey) Back To School Tax Credit – Introduced 02/04/10
  • AB 1779 (Niello) Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Modification and Extension -Introduced 02/09/10
  • AB 1806 (Hagman, et al.) Exclusion Of Capital Gain On Sale Of Principal Residence By Surviving Spouse -Amended 03/15/10
  • AB 2177 (Torlakson/Beall) Allow Electronic Communication To Taxpayers To Inform Of Tax Change Or Obligation – Introduced 02/18/10

Assembly Special Session Bills

  • ABX8 34 (Jeffries) Principal Residence Credit – Introduced 02/01/10

Senate Bills

  • SB 1076 (Price) Voluntary Contribution Fund Designation/Arts Council Fund – Introduced 02/17/10
  • SB 1316 (Romero) Legislative Intent To enact Legislation To Phase Out Specified Tax Credits – Introduced 02/19/10
  • SB 1391 (Yee) PIT Definitions Technical Amendment – Introduced 02/19/10

BOE March Bulletin

March 19th, 2010

New tax rates to take effect April 1, 2010
Voters in two cities in California have approved new transactions (sales) and use taxes (district taxes) that are effective April 1, 2010. The new rates apply only within each city’s incorporated limits. The tax rates outside the incorporated city limits will remain the same.

City of Gustine 8.75 percent
The City of Gustine, located in Merced County, approved a 0.50 percent City of Gustine transactions and use tax, (GSTG/224) which will increase the tax rate within city limits to 8.75 percent from 8.25 percent.

City of San Mateo 9.50 percent
The City of San Mateo, located in San Mateo County, approved a 0.25 percent City of San Mateo transactions and use tax (SMTG/226), which will increase the tax rate within city limits to 9.50 percent from 9.25 percent.

Is your address in the city limits or unincorporated county?
You can verify whether your business is located within a city that has a district tax. District boundaries are generally defined by city and county lines. Many California zip codes overlap city and county lines. To determine which district taxes affect your sales, visit www.boe.ca.gov/sutax/ cityaddresses.htm for a listing of city links. If you do not find the city you are looking for on our website, you may contact the city directly to determine whether or not your business or your customer is within the city boundaries.

Tax Rate Locator
As an additional resource for obtaining the sales and use tax rate for a specific address, you may want to use the free tax rate locator service on the Group 1 Software Local Sales and Use Tax Rate Locator website. That site allows any person to determine local tax jurisdictions and tax rates based on address. However, the geotax site is not maintained by the Board of Equalization (BOE) and the link is provided only as a public service. The BOE is not responsible for the content or accuracy of the information shown on that site.

For more information
For information on district taxes, please see publication 44, District Taxes. For updated tax rates throughout California, see publication 71, California City and County Sales and Use Tax Rates. BOE publications are available at www.boe.ca.gov.

If you are a qualified purchaser, your 2009 use tax return and payment are due by April 15, 2010

Revenue and Taxation Code (RTC) section 6225 now requires a “qualified purchaser” to register with the BOE and report and pay use tax directly to the BOE annually. In general, use tax applies to purchases of merchandise from out-of-state sellers (both foreign and domestic) for storage, use, or other consumption in California. If the out-of-state seller does not collect use tax on your purchase, then you must pay the applicable use tax directly to the BOE. This is true whether the purchases were made in person, over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail order. If an out-of-state seller charges you California tax, you should be sure to obtain a receipt. The use tax rate for any location is the same as the sales tax rate and applies to the purchase price of the property.

A “qualified purchaser,” is a person that meets all of the following conditions:
• Receives at least $100,000 in gross receipts from business operations per calendar year. Note: Gross receipts is the total of all receipts from both in-state and out-of-state business operations.

• Is not required to hold a seller’s permit or certificate of registration for use tax.
• Is not a holder of a use tax direct payment permit.
• Is not otherwise registered with the BOE to report use tax.
While the BOE has contacted many qualified purchasers in order to register them, it remains the qualified purchaser’s responsibility to register with the BOE. To register for a use tax account complete a BOE-404-A, Use Tax Registration, and submit it to the BOE. A qualified purchaser is also required to file a return, reporting and paying use tax on the total purchase price of tangible merchandise that is subject to use tax during the preceding calendar year, and for which tax was not paid to a retailer required to collect the use tax.

Please note: This does do not apply to the purchase of a vehicle, vessel, or aircraft. Registered qualified purchasers can electronically file (eFile) a use tax return through the BOE’s free eFiling system (BOE-file). The return for 2009, along with payment, is due by April 15, 2010.

For additional information regarding your registration and reporting requirements, please refer to publication 123, California Businesses: How to Identify California Use Tax Due, and special notice, L-232, New Registration and Reporting Requirements for Certain Purchasers (September 2009). For additional information on eFiling, refer to publication 159, eFile Guide. All BOE forms and publications are available at www.boe.ca.gov.

Certain nonprofit organizations are regarded as consumers, rather than retailers

Effective immediately through January 1, 2015, Assembly Bill 1486 provides that 501(c) membership organizations are consumers and not retailers of certain sales of tangible personal property (merchandise) sold to the organizations’ members under specific conditions. The requirements are:
1. The merchandise bears a logo or other identifying mark of the organization and is a promotional item or an item commonly associated with use by a member to demonstrate the member’s association with, or membership in, the organization.
2. The selling price of the merchandise to the member of the organization does not exceed the cost by the nonprofit organization to obtain and transfer the merchandise. The costs include any applicable sales or use tax paid by the nonprofit organization.
3. Reasonable steps are taken by the organization to ensure that no member is allowed to acquire more than 30 identical items of this merchandise or to resell the items to another person.
4. The merchandise is not distributed for political campaigning purposes or issue advocacy.

The purpose of this bill is to relieve nonprofit organizations from the burdensome and time-consuming task of maintaining records and filing sales tax returns for their sales of promotional items to members, when the sales prices of those promotional items are no more than the cost to the organization.

Flavored cigarettes banned in U.S.
Effective September 22, 2009, cigarettes that contain certain characterizing flavors are considered adulterated and the manufacture, import, and sale of these products are banned in the United States as authorized by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA). The FSPTCA provides the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with regulatory authority over the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products. According to the Act:
“…a cigarette or any of its component parts (including the tobacco, filter, or paper) shall not contain, as a constituent (including a smoke constituent) or additive, an artificial or natural flavor (other than tobacco or menthol) or an herb or spice, including strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon, pineapple, vanilla, coconut, licorice, cocoa, chocolate, cherry or coffee, that is a characterizing flavor of the tobacco product or tobacco smoke.”
These products can no longer be manufactured, imported, or sold in the United States.

For general information regarding the FDA’s Tobacco Program and the ban on flavored cigarettes, please refer to the FDA’s website at www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/default.htm.

In compliance with the new federal law, flavored cigarettes banned by the FSPTCA have been removed and may continue to be removed from the California Tobacco Directory by California’s Attorney General. Cigarette and Tobacco Products Licensees should refer regularly to the California Tobacco Directory provided at www.ag.ca.gov/tobacco/directory.php for a product list of cigarette manufacturers and brand families that are authorized for sale in California.

It is illegal for distributors to affix a California tax stamp on packages of cigarettes or pay the tax on roll-your-own product unless the manufacturer and the brand family are listed in the California Tobacco Directory. Sales of cigarettes and roll-your-own products that are not listed in the California Tobacco Directory are prohibited and could be seized by federal, state, or local law enforcement authorities.

Sales of toasted sandwiches are taxable
Sandwich shops, delicatessens, and other retailers that sell sandwiches, beverages and other hot food need to be aware that to-go sales of hot prepared food products are taxable (see exception below for hot bakery items). A food product is considered a hot food product if it is heated to a temperature above room temperature (for example, grilling or toasting a sandwich, dipping a sandwich in hot gravy, or using infrared lights, steam tables, or microwave ovens). Examples of hot prepared food products include hot sandwiches, pizza, barbecued chicken, soup, consommé, bouillon, steak, and so forth.

Food is considered “hot” even if it has cooled by the time of sale since it was intended to be sold as a hot food. If your customer buys a cold food product to go and heats the food product in a microwave oven that is accessible to the public, the sale is not taxable. It is considered a sale of a cold food product to go.

Exception: Sales of hot bakery goods are not taxable when sold to go, unless they are sold as part of a combination package. For example, a combination of hot coffee and a doughnut for a single price is taxable because the combination package includes a hot food or hot beverage. For additional information see publication 22, Dining and Beverage Industry.

Are you familiar with the BOE’s website?
A wealth of information is available on the BOE’s website at www.boe.ca.gov.
On our website you’ll find an overview of the BOE’s organization, the professional history and qualifications of each Board Member, including the State Controller, who is the fifth, ex-officio, Board Member. Sections about the tax programs administered by the BOE are provided as well. These programs include: Sales and Use, Property, Timber, Fuel, and Excise Taxes, and Environmental Fees.

We also offer services to assist you! Our Help Center pages contain answers to frequently asked questions and if you have a question not addressed on the FAQ page, we provide a toll-free number for our Taxpayer Information Section so you can speak with a live person for assistance. On our website, you’ll find instructions and requirements for efiling, along with the methods of making electronic payments via credit card or Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). We provide access to tax returns, required forms, and reference materials such as sales and use tax regulations, and BOE publications geared to assist specific business owners (for example, restaurants, jewelers and contractors) in learning the tax requirements that pertain to each industry. Many of our publications have been translated into various foreign languages as well.

There is a section on taxpayers’ rights that includes links to our Taxpayers’ Rights Advocate Office, the Tax Appellate Program, Offer in Compromise, and our Settlement Program. The Tax Appellate Program is the conduit to file appeals as the result of a BOE audit. The Offer in Compromise Program allows you to make a proposal to pay the BOE an amount that is less than the full amount of the tax or fee due on an account. Our Settlement Program provides that while you are pursuing an appeal (such as a petition for redetermination, an administrative protest, or a claim for refund) you may be able to propose a settlement of your case.

You will also find the dates and locations for future Board and Committee meetings. Should your interests focus on current or past legislation, links to these are also available. A yearly index and archived copies of the Tax Information Bulletin are also available for reference.

We are always working to develop new content that will be useful to people doing business in California. We hope you will explore and access the valuable information provided on the BOE’s website.

BOE’s online educational seminars

The BOE announced the expansion of its available online educational products to include the virtual replication of Small Business Fairs and Nonprofit Seminars.

These online products are a cost effective, convenient way for taxpayers to learn about the BOE tax programs and how to comply with California tax laws. The virtual seminars are designed specifically to enhance the in-person attention taxpayers can get through sales and use tax classes offered in BOE offices, and seminars offered throughout the state.

The BOE also offers a total virtual one-stop-shop option for Small Business Fairs and Nonprofit Seminars. The site includes links to our seminar partners: Internal Revenue Service, Franchise Tax Board, Employment Development Department, U.S. Small Business Administration, and other local, state and federal agencies. There you will find contact information, presentations, videos, audio recordings and much more!

We’re number 50!

March 17th, 2010

The Sac Bee just covered that the state of California has been ranked as the worst state in the nation in regard to tax administration. The article is below:

Cal rated worst state on tax administration
California has the nation’s worst state tax administration practices, the Council on State Taxation, a corporate-backed and Washington-based tax study organization, says in a new report.

California scored a D-minus, the lowest score of any state, on an eight-criterion assessment, a notch lower than seven other “D” states. Alaska, at A-minus, scored the highest.

“It is a common truth that taxpayers will more fully and willingly comply with a tax system they perceive to be balanced, fair, and effective,” the organization said. “Taxpayers operating in a system they perceive as oppressive, unfair, or otherwise biased are less likely to voluntarily comply. The clear message to state legislatures is that they must be sensitive to the compliance implications and competitiveness concerns created by poor tax administrative rules and ineffective tax appeal systems.”

California was rated especially poorly on the independence of its tax dispute resolution process. A three-member board composed of politicians or their surrogates, the Franchise Tax Board, oversees personal and corporate tax collection. A five-member board of elected officials, the Board of Equalization, handles appeals from the Franchise Tax Board, directly collects sales taxes and oversees property tax administration.

Analyses Posted This Week by the FTB

March 15th, 2010

Analyses Posted This Week

Assembly Bills

  • AB 347 (Bass, et al.) Charitable Contribution Deduction Haiti Earthquake – Revised Original 01/27/10
  • AB 347 (Bass, et al.) Charitable Contribution Deduction Haiti Earthquake – FINAL
  • AB 1806 (Hagman) Exclusion Of Capital Gain On Sale Of Residence By Surviving Spouse – Introduced 02/10/10
  • AB 1983 (Torrico) Safely Surrendered Baby Fund – Introduced 02/18/10

Assembly Special Session Bills

  • ABX8 8 (Comm on Budget) Occupational And Professional License Suspension For Unpaid Tax/Abusive Tax Shelters/Financial Institution Record Match- Amended 02/17/10

Senate Special Session Bills

  • SBX6 3 (Calderon) Principal Residence Credit – Introduced 02/08/10
  • SBX8 8 (Budget Comm) Occupational And Professional License Suspension For Unpaid Tax/Abusive Tax Shelters/Financial Institution Record Match – Introduced 02/22/10
  • SBX8 29 (Steinberg, et al.) FTB, BOE & Employees In Positions Funded 95 Percent By Other Sources Than General Fund Exempt From Furloughs – Introduced 02/05/10 & Amended 03/04/10
  • SBX8 29 (Steinberg, et al.) FTB, BOE & Employees In Positions Funded 95 Percent By Other Sources Than General Fund Exempt From Furloughs – FINAL
  • SBX8 39 (Calderon) Principal Residence Credit – Introduced 02/08/10

Good statement by the U of Pacific prof about hiring tax credits

March 12th, 2010

Barbara Hayes, the executive director of the Sacramento Area Commerce and Trade organization had some interesting remarks in the CalWatchdog this past week in regards to the state’s enterprise zone, below is what she discussed:

Hayes said there were two state programs that are effective: The Enterprise Zone program and the Employee Training Panel. Hayes also implored committee members to implement again an investment tax credit, at least for a “Clean and Green” type program. “Something is needed in the way of investment tax credits” for California businesses, she said.

The EZ program continues to be one of the most appealing aspects of doing business in California, and the more cities that are added to the program, the more jobs that will be created. The enterprise program speaks directly to the job loss hike that started even before the recession began a few years ago, and drastic measures will need to be taken in order to fix the problem.

Franchise Tax Board News for March 2010

March 10th, 2010

From an updated taxpayer’s bill of rights to W-2 information, click below to find a news summary from the Franchise Tax Board for March 2010.

Click here to visit site.

In case you were wondering how many bills were introduced by the California Legislature in the past week

March 8th, 2010

Here’s a piece from today’s Sacramento Bee:

Legislators were apparently all too aware. The record shows that 1,321 “regular” bills were introduced between last Tuesday and Friday, 888 in the Assembly and 433 in the Senate. That breaks down to:

* 330.3 a day
* 13.8 an hour
*1.15 every five minutes

It’s also an average of 11 bills for each lawmaker, and it does not include bills introduced before last Tuesday. Nor does it include resolutions, proposed constitutional amendments or measures proposed in any of the eight special sessions that have run or are running concurrently with the regular session.

According to legislative staffers, this year’s crop was actually not too big, probably owing to the paucity of state funds. See? There’s always a silver lining…

Weekly Enterprise Zone Feature: Santa Ana, CA

March 5th, 2010

Santa Ana, CA, has a rich commerce heritage. One of Santa Ana’s most notable businesses is the Rickenbacker musical instrument company, whose electric guitars and bass guitars earned fame in the hands of many rock and roll legends. Santa Ana is also the home of the First American Corporation and Ingram Micro, and the original Glenn L. Martin aviation company, which later merged with the Lockheed Corporation to form the largest aircraft and weapons manufacturing corporation on the planet, Lockheed Martin.

If you are joining the ranks of these prestigious companies in Santa Ana and want to see what types of tax benefits you can take advantage of, please contact us for a free consultation.

It's Time for Businesses to Grow

March 3rd, 2010

While going through the Enterprise Zone commentary this past week I found a great post by Randy Gordon, the President and CEO of the Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce discussing the absolute need for the EZ program that the state of California provides.

Below are some of my favorite thoughts that he posted, “We are in a time of double-digit unemployment rates, significant underemployment, minimal economic diversity, budget deficits, and a record-high of inventory of vacant business and industrial space. Expansion, not elimination of the California Enterprise Zone program that rewards businesses and employees for locating and expanding in economically challenged neighborhoods, including a large portion of Long Beach, should be encouraged.

The California Enterprise Zone (EZ) Program does exactly that, which is why we will be asking you to follow our lead and contact your representatives in Sacramento and urge them to protect the Enterprise Zone Program and oppose any attempt to dissolve or decrease enterprise zone areas or incentives.

Tax incentives that are part of Enterprise Zones include such things as equipment, hiring, worker credits, tax deductions, and preference points that can help them secure state-sponsored contracts. In other words, tools that attract businesses and promote economic development.”

California Cities Continue to Expand Enterprise Zone Efforts

March 1st, 2010

It’s taken a while, however the Santa Clarita Valley region has hired a lobbyist to ensure that the area’s interests are represented well at the capital.

Natalie Everett, from the Signal, reports the following regarding the hire, “Damian Jones has 15 years of experience in the field, including a stint as The Home Depot’s government relations senior manager. His firm, Pacific Strategy Group, represents about 350 clients in 17 offices across the nation. One of the first issues Jones will tackle is securing Santa Clarita’s enterprise zone. A bill is making its way through the state Legislature that would make eligibility for the lucrative tax breaks – up to $37,000 for one employee over five years – harder to get.”

“(We recently) held a forum for existing business owners asking them what were the benefits of doing business in the Santa Clarita Valley, and the No. 1 answer was availability of the enterprise zone,” Jones said. “Real dollars are being saved, it’s improving our economy, and people are trying to … minimize their impact.”

It’s great to see cities from around the state are realizing the importance of the Enterprise Zones and are putting the resources needed behind their plans.

 
 
Home | Newsroom | About Us | Upcoming Events | FAQ | Contact | Blog | RSS RSS
5670 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1530, Los Angeles, CA 90036, Ph: 310-402-2780, Fax: 866-381-3118
© 2010 C&I Tax Consultants. All rights reserved.