Home | Newsroom | About Us | Upcoming Events | FAQ | Contact | Blog | RSS RSS
 
 
 

Governor’s May Revise Steers Clear of Enterprise Zones

May 14th, 2012

 

Governor Brown’s May Revise does not specifically mention enterprise zones.  In a number of places, the budget blames lower revenues on increased and “unpredictable” use of corporate tax credits as well as the lack of the type of credit limitations that existed in 2008-2009.

The Dicon Opinion

April 27th, 2012
 
Here is the actual Opinion.  The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the FTB based primarily on the FTB’s general audit powers which, as the Court cited, are not supplanted or limited by the regulatory scheme concerning an employer obtaining a voucher. “The FTB may rely upon this certification if it so chooses, and the Attorney General has acknowledged that the FTB likely will do so ―perhaps even in most cases, to the employer‘s benefit.”

“As the FTB explains in its opening brief: ―It is . . . reasonable to conclude that vouchers provide for an additional level of review which may satisfy the Board in some cases, while not in others. For example, in some cases the Board‘s review of a statistically significant sample of an employer‘s vouchers may convince it that the vouchers were properly issued only for eligible workers. In this case the Board may accept the vouchers without demanding the production of specific documentation of worker eligibility, or without any additional investigation. In other cases, though, the review of the employer‘s vouchers may raise concerns with the Board, or even reveal that vouchers were improperly issued. In these cases the Board will prudently demand evidence or documentation of worker eligibility. The Board is not required to audit every voucher in every case, just as it is not required to audit every taxpayer‘s return; in fact, the Board‘s limited budget effectively prevents this as a practical matter. In fact, given budgetary constraints, one would expect that the Board‘s review of employee eligibility would probably occur only in those cases where it has information that vouchers may have been improperly issued. The FTB cites several weaknesses in the vouchering process that could lead the FTB to audit a voucher, noting that ―at the time the vouchers were issued in this case there were no statutory or regulatory requirements regarding the documentation required to obtain or issue a voucher. In addition, there is no requirement for an agency that issues vouchers to communicate at all with the employees for whom it is required to supply vouchers, and vouchers may be retroactively issued years after the employment takes place. [¶] Nor, until new regulations that became effective November 27, 2006, was there even a requirement that enterprise zone agencies keep voucher records. [Citation.]

We find reasonable the FTB‘s view that ―[t]he voucher process complements the review/audit process and enhances its efficiency by allowing the Board to rely on vouchers in those situations where it has confidence in their accuracy, while requiring evidence in those cases where it does not. Because the FTB‘s interpretation of section 23622.7 is reasonable, there is no statutory conflict that requires the certification process to be harmonized with the laws governing the FTB‘s authority in the particular way urged by Dicon and the Court of Appeal.”

 
 

 

Supreme Court Rules In FTB’s Favor in Dicon Case

April 26th, 2012

 

In an unanimous opinion today, the California Supreme Court ruled  that the FTB can in fact audit behind the EZ voucher.  The voucher certificate is no longer considered “prima facie” evidence that the worker is qualified for the EZ program.  The opinion states:

We reverse the Court of Appeal’s holding that a certification issued by a governmental agency for purposes of the hiring tax credit under Revenue and Taxation Code section 23622.7 constitutes “prima facie proof of a worker is a ‘qualified employee,’ ” which shifts to the Franchise Tax board the “burden of demonstrating an employee is not a qualified worker for which no voucher should have issued. ” In all other respects, the Franchise Tax Board does not challenge the Court of Appeal’s judgment, and it is affirmed. Majority Opinion by Liu, J. — joined by Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, and Corrigan, JJ.

Amid Tough Business Climate, California Entrepreneurs Flourish In Part Becuase Of The Enterprise Zone

April 5th, 2012

 

An article in Fox Business lists all the reasons NOT to do business in California.  Yet despite all the negatives, entrepeneurs seem to flourish in the state.    One of the bright spots is undoubtedly the Enterprise Zone tax credits. “Other business ventures that benefit California’s populace may be eligible for numerous tax credits, including enterprise zone credits, economic development area credits and targeted tax area credits.”

Read the full article.

Sequoia Valley Enterprise Zone Looking to Expand by 4,800 Acres

April 2nd, 2012

 

The Sequoia Valley Enterprise Zone, designated as such in January 2009, currently consists of 33,902 acres, and includes commercial, industrial, non-commercial and non-industrial areas, according to a Porterville Economic Development Department staff report.

The proposed expansion would increase Porterville’s boundaries by 72 parcels for a total of 143 acres. Tulare County’s enterprise zone, which includes the south county communities of Terra Bella, Tipton and Richgrove among 10 others, would be expanded by approximately 3,310 acres.

Read the full article.

Enterprise Zones the One Bright Spot in an Otherwise Tough California Business Climate

March 27th, 2012

 

In a recent survey, ”almost three-fourths (73%) of California firms that do business in multiple states say it is harder doing business in the Golden State than in other states, according to the 2012 business climate survey of the California Foundation for Commerce and Education.  That finding is higher than in 2011 (57%) or in 2010 (63%). The study of 699 businesses is sponsored by the California Chamber of Commerce. No one in the 2012 survey said California is an easier place to do business.”

Respondents are “overwhelmingly unimpressed by California’s state government. Only 2% could name a state action in the past year that helped make it easier to run their business.  Among the action named were enterprise zone tax credits, worker’s compensation reform and minimum-wage increase failed.”

Read the full OC Register article.

Court of Appeal Affirms FTB’s Position Re Sales or Use Tax Credit for Current Expense Assets

March 13th, 2012

 

The Second District Court of Appeals today ruled that the enterprise zone sales and use tax credit of Revenue and Taxation Code Sec. 23612.2 is not available in connection with the purchase of current expense assets, but rather only with the purchase of capital assets.  Read the full opinion.

Assemblyman Louis Alejo Introduces Bill to Save Expiring Enterprise Zones

February 17th, 2012

 

Assemblyman Louis Alejo, who has been a big supporter of the EZ program over the last few years, has introduced a new bill, AB 484, to address the operation of expiring zones.   Assemblyman Alejo’s district includes Watsonville which is set to expire.  HCD has indicated that it will not be renewing expiring zones or designating new ones for now.  Alejo’s bill seeks to extend the expiring zones until new zones are designated.

Dicon Case Set For Oral Argument

February 1st, 2012

 

The California Supreme Court has scheduled oral argument in the Dicon case for Tuesday, March 6, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in San Francisco.

Brown’s Budget Claims It Will Reform Enterprise Zone Program

January 5th, 2012

 

Brown’s budget released today only hints at future reform measures to the Enterprise Zone program.  Perhaps after getting rid of RDAs, the unions are a bit gunshy about outwardly attempting getting rid of another vehicle that has anything to do with jobs while the economy struggles.  Here is what the budget said about Enterprise Zones:

“The resulting stability from a balanced budget will give businesses the certainty and the reassurance they need to invest in California. In addition, the Administration will propose legislation to reform the enterprise zone program and move to a mandatory single sales factor for apportioning multistate business income. Such changes will allow the state to afford investments in manufacturing, business incentives, and other tax relief.”

 
 
Home | Newsroom | About Us | Upcoming Events | FAQ | Contact | Blog | RSS RSS
5670 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1530, Los Angeles, CA 90036, Ph: 310-402-2780, Fax: 866-381-3118
© 2010 C&I Tax Consultants. All rights reserved.