A plethora of different business group are collaborating together to host a small business tax forum which will include discussions on taking advantage of the Enterprise Zone Program.  The different groups include Oakland’s Mayor, Alameda County Small Business Development Center, Northern California Small Business Financial Development Corporation, Black Economic Council, Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, East Bay Economic Development Alliance, The Women’s Chamber of Commerce, Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, African American Chamber of Commerce, Oakland Chinatown Chamber of Commerce and the Alameda County Bar Association.

 Here is the flyer for the event.

The LA Times editorial board actually wrote last week that California’s businesses are not overtaxed.    Some might disagree with that proposition.  Loren Kaye, President of the California Foundation for Commerce and Education brings some pretty convincing facts to prove that California’s businesses are considerably overtaxed and at a disadvantage right out of the gate because of oppressive taxation and poor leadership.

The fundamental problem with the Times article, and much of the left-of-center criticism of California business taxation – is that they posit a world where public policy is a passive pawn in the hands of manipulative corporations, in the words of Controller John Chiang, “A lot of the tax credits are given to larger business…”

No, not “given.” Companies invest in California, buy equipment and buildings, hire workers, are successful in producing and selling their product or service, make a profit – in California – pay taxes, and earn a credit if they have made investments according to the policies underlying the credit. This is an active, dynamic and competitive economy, influenced by state policy and the interest in businesses in investing here.

Read the entire article here.

Colton Mayor Kelly Chastain boasts about how the San Bernardino Enterprise Zone has helped keep businesses and how she plans to attract more businesses. 

Having served the residents of Colton for 14 years, I have seen firsthand how tax incentives and funding programs support businesses. The city of Colton is among the locations in California to be a part of a designated Enterprise Zone. These zones offer employers a series of business and tax incentives to help them offset the high cost of doing business in the state.

Read the full San Bernardino Sun article here.

That’s what Fox Business News guest called California’s legislature in explaining why 144 companies left California this year.  Business relocation expert Joseph Vranich listed a host of reasons why California is the worst state in the union to do business.  Negative business climate, high regulation and excessive taxes were all reasons why companies are fleeing California.  Los Angeles, Vranich said, was the worst city in United States to do business.  See the interview here.

This year’s CAEZ conference will feature prominent business consultant Larry Kosmont. 

Kosmont is an industry veteran who specializes in providing economic development, finance, and real estate advisory services to both public agencies and private corporations. As an economic development consultant Kosmont assists companies with finding business-friendly cities.

He established Encino-based Kosmont Companies in 1986 and is well known for founding The Kosmont – Rose Institute Cost of Doing Business Survey™, a national publication that compares taxes and incentives for more than 400 cities and counties nationwide.

Read the Highland News article here.

Mission Foods is taking advantage of the new Valley EZ by opening up a $50 million facility that will produce 400 new jobs.  Read the San Fernando Valley Business Journal article.

While the anti EZ academicians spew about the inefficacy of the program, they ignore the plain reality that businesses do rely on the EZ program to expand their businesses.  Empirical evidence alone will never provide the full picture.  This is particularly so here where the empirical data is being questioned.  Couple that with the mounds of strong anecdotal evidence that has come to light recently clearly shows that the EZ program provide a significant benefit to California businesses.  When these businesses grow, or decide not to move out of state, California’s employee win as does the government with increased revenue and better job projections.  An article in this weekend’s Santa Clarita Valley Signal is illustrative.

The enterprise-zone tax credits have played a key role in the business’ growth over the past two years, [DME Direct ]owner Andrew Everett said.
“We started this business from our house,” Everett said. “The purchase of our warehouse was directly related to the fact that it was in the enterprise zone.”
Because of the credits, “we can employ more people and grow our business,” Everett said, adding that the tax savings translated to five new employees over the past two years.

 The full article can be read here.

Three years after Santa Clarita’s enterprise zone went into effect, the business community is pushing to have it expanded to cover more of the valley.

California’s 42 enterprise zones are intended to boost business in disadvantaged areas by providing tax breaks for businesses that hire workers who meet certain criteria, from laid-off workers to veterans, and for specific projects such as business expansions.  Here is the link to the full article.

The National City Chamber of Commerce issued its official stand in favor of California’s Enterprise Zone program.  The complete letter from Pres/CEO Jaqueline Reynoso can be viewed here.

Walters, typically very hostile towards Enterprise Zones, issued a short article this morning in which he urges a review of what he considers “all tax loopholes.”  The article notes that LA City Mayor Antonio  Villaraigosa recently took a shot at Senate President Pro Tem Steinberg for authoring SB 974 which seeks to shift EZ funds to a new high school training program.  The article also notes that Gov. Schwarzenegger recently issued his support for expanded EZs.  In conclusion, Walters merely seeks a wholesale review of all tax “loopholes” rather than the usually vociferous and targeted cry to eliminate specifically the Enterprise Zone program.  This could be seen as recognition that the EZs have strong support from upper levels of government and more importantly, that being able to tout the EZ program has immediate and positive tangible and intangible effects on the business climate and job creation.