The Pacific Research Institute poses an interesting question that many business owners across the state have been pondering: should all of California become an Enterprise Zone?

K. Lloyd Billingsley proposes the following ideas below:

An enterprise zone is an economically depressed area targeted for revitalization through tax and regulatory relief. Such relief attracts business, provides jobs, reduces poverty and generally improves conditions. California has 42 enterprise zones, recently criticized as “ineffective” by scholars David Neumark and Jed Kolko. That prompted some business owners to fire back.

“The Enterprise Zones scattered throughout the state are like a business-friendly oasis in the desert of high-cost and regulation that is California,” wrote Daniel Morrow in the February 12, 2009, Capitol Weekly. “The tax breaks for buying equipment and hiring people provide exactly the kind of incentive that is necessary to get business to stay in California in the first place and serve as an attraction for new businesses as well, one of the very few California has to offer.”

California could also use another idea favored by Jack Kemp, an advocate of the flat tax. This means everybody pays the same rate, instead of a more punitive (what “progressive” really means) rate for high-income workers. During an economic downturn, punitive rates make for revenue instability. In Ending the Revenue Rollercoaster (2008), PRI’s Robert P. Murphy made the case for a flat state income tax of 3 percent. Said Steve Forbes, “A 3 percent flat tax would trigger the biggest boom in California since the Gold Rush!” And a flat income tax would help prevent the boom from being followed by a bust, our current condition.

Tags: california, Enterprise Zone, flat tax, jack kemp

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 26th, 2010 at 4:44 am and is filed under Tax News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.