<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News and Views for the California Enterprise Zones &#187; V. Manuel Pérez</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=v-manuel-perez" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canditax.com/blog</link>
	<description>From the tax credit experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Labor&#8217;s Attempt to Limit EZ Credits Fails in Committee</title>
		<link>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=1250</link>
		<comments>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=1250#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StevenDotan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 1278]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california enterprise zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise zone news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zone Tax Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZ tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperial valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V. Manuel Pérez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canditax.com/blog/?p=1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  In today&#8217;s Daily Journal: A bill intended to close a loophole in existing law that lets companies relocate to another city within the state to gain lucrative tax credits failed to pass out of a legislative committee yesterday. Assembly Bill 1278, authored by Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, was inspired by a company, VWR International, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>In today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=165879&amp;title=Tax%20break%20zone%20bill%20shelved">Daily Journal</a>:</p>
<p>A bill intended to close a loophole in existing law that lets companies relocate to another city within the state to gain lucrative tax credits failed to pass out of a legislative committee yesterday.</p>
<p>Assembly Bill 1278, authored by Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, was inspired by a company, VWR International, that is ditching Brisbane to relocate to an enterprise zone in the city of Visalia.</p>
<p>But Hill failed to get the four votes needed to move the bill past the committee stage.</p>
<p>“The bill was not supported by the chair. I thought I could do it now and was looking for one Republican to support it,” Hill said.</p>
<p>The state Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy is chaired by Manuel Perez, D-Coachella. Perez’s Assembly District includes Imperial County, which officially opposed Hill’s legislation.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Perez’s 80th Assembly District covers all of Imperial County and parts of Riverside County and the area’s high jobless figures prompted him to vote against Hill’s bill.</p>
<p>“Coming from a community with unemployment over 20 percent and that has historically suffered from a lack of private investment and jobs, I’m always concerned about the impacts of business closures on families and communities. My vote today does not reflect my lack of concern about this issue but rather the importance of pushing for a broader enterprise zone reform agenda,” Perez wrote to the Daily Journal in an email.</p>
<p>AB 1278 represented a piecemeal approach, which Perez believes would undermine efforts to reform the enterprise zone program.</p>
<p>“I initiated the reform conversation more than a year ago and the negotiation includes a number of issues such as business relocation and the tighter targeting of business incentives. Some of the reform proposals are in my bills, AB 231 and AB 1411. I hope my actions today will induce labor and business to come back to the table,” he continued in the email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1250</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assemblymember V. Manuel Pérez Discusses the Future of the EZ Program</title>
		<link>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=757</link>
		<comments>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=757#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven Dotan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab 2476]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zone Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V. Manuel Pérez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canditax.com/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assemblymember V. Manuel Pérez, representative from Imperial County, weighed in on KXO Radio discussing the future of the Enterprise Zone program: &#8220;We cannot overlook the state’s Enterprise Zone program. I spent a lot of time last year facilitating a hearing process to examine many aspects of this program, and I appreciate the efforts of stakeholders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assemblymember V. Manuel Pérez, representative from Imperial County, weighed in on KXO Radio discussing the future of the Enterprise Zone program:</p>
<p>&#8220;We cannot overlook the state’s Enterprise Zone program. I spent a lot of time last year facilitating a hearing process to examine many aspects of this program, and I appreciate the efforts of stakeholders to participate in the dialogue.  Last month, I introduced AB 2476 to serve as a vehicle for statutory reforms to the program.  As the bill currently reads, it makes changes to the eligibility criteria for Targeted Employment Areas. I see this measure as a starting point and look forward to ongoing and productive discussions as we refine the bill language and make an important program even better.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=757</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
