<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News and Views for the California Enterprise Zones &#187; tri-city region</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=tri-city-region" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canditax.com/blog</link>
	<description>From the tax credit experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oxnard Upset About Enterprise Zone Snub</title>
		<link>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=508</link>
		<comments>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=508#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxnard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state of california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tri-city region]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canditax.com/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite a strong effort, the State of California has not given the city of Oxnard its desired Enterprise Zone. This has caused a significant stir in the region, since, from all appearances, Oxnard seemed to be an excellent candidate.  Instead of Oxnard, the state chose to award its new designations to: Hesperia Taft Tulare Pittsburg [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite a strong effort, the State of California has not given the city of Oxnard its desired Enterprise Zone.  This has caused a significant stir in the region, since, from all appearances, Oxnard seemed to be an excellent candidate.  Instead of Oxnard, the state chose to award its new designations to:</p>
<ul>
<li> Hesperia</li>
<li> Taft</li>
<li> Tulare</li>
<li> Pittsburg</li>
<li> Sacramento</li>
</ul>
<p>The Pacific Coast Business Times showed considerable consternation at the state&#8217;s decision:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Oxnard is the biggest city in the biggest county in the tri-county region.  It has a pro-business attitude, plenty of land and utility resources, a large and eager workforce and a desire to lead the state’s economic recovery.  But that apparently means nothing in Sacramento, where the California Enterprise Zone Program recently turned down Oxnard’s request to join 41 other enterprise-zone locations in the state.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<div class="tradevibes_linkdiv"><a class="tradevibes_show_widget" href="http://www.tradevibes.com/company/profile/c-i-tax">C &amp; I Tax</a></div>
<p><script src="http://widget.tradevibes.com/widget/c-i-tax" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=508</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
