<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News and Views for the California Enterprise Zones &#187; proposal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=proposal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canditax.com/blog</link>
	<description>From the tax credit experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Proposal for Overhauling California’s Tax System</title>
		<link>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=514</link>
		<comments>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=514#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.canditax.com/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger’s Committee on the 21st Century Just Came Out With Its Draft Proposal for Overhauling California’s Tax System. The tax commission has just released draft language of its package, which includes the following:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schwarzenegger’s Committee on the 21st Century Just Came Out With Its Draft Proposal for Overhauling California’s Tax System.  The tax commission has just released <a href="http://www.cotce.ca.gov/" target="_blank">draft language</a> of its package, which includes the following:</p>
<p>&#8211; Lower personal <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/income+tax/">income tax</a> for all filers, phased in over three years through 2014. Single filers would have an automatic deduction of $22,500, while joint filers would have an automatic deduction of $45,000. Filers would pay 2.75 percent on taxable income up to $28,000 single and $56,000 joint. They would pay 6.5 percent on all taxable income above those levels.The only itemized deductions for filers would be <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/mortgage+interest/">mortgage interest,</a> <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/property+taxes/">property taxes</a> and charitable contributions.</p>
<p>The current state income tax bracket tops out at 9.55 percent (which includes a .25 percent temporary increase approved in February). Millionaires pay an additional 1 percent on income above $1 million, and they would continue to pay that under the new plan.</p>
<p>While all <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/tax+filers/">tax filers</a> would pay lower taxes, the commission&#8217;s Powerpoint presentation shows that the new lower <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/tax+brackets/">tax brackets</a> make the system less progressive in nature. The drop to 6.5 percent from 9.55 percent is most significant for higher-income earners, who already pay most of the state&#8217;s personal income taxes. While filers earning between $50,000 and $75,000 would get a 14 percent cut on their taxes, those earning $75,000 and above would get roughly a 30 percent reduction.</p>
<div id="more">
<p>&#8211; Business taxes. The state would eliminate the corporation tax immediately in 2012. It would phase out the 5 percent state sales tax share from 2012 to 2016. Retailers would still charge <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/sales+taxes/">sales taxes</a> that pay for local governments.</p>
<p>To make up for the loss of corporation and sales tax revenue, the state would install a new business net receipts tax, essentially a value-added tax that firms doing business in <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/California/">California</a> would pay on all revenues minus capital expenditures. The proposed rate is 4.2 percent, lower than the current corporation and sales tax rates. Businesses with less than $500,000 in revenues or $250,000 in <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/tax+liabilities/">tax liabilities</a> would be exempt.</p>
<p>This tax would be phased in over five years, starting at 2 percent in 2012.</p>
<p>Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger-appointed commissioner <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/John+Cogan/">John Cogan,</a> a Hoover Institution fellow, and Democratic-appointed commissioner <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Christopher+Edley/">Christopher Edley,</a> dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, issued a <a href="http://www.cotce.ca.gov/documents/correspondence/staff_and_commissioners/documents/Cogan-Edley%20memo.pdf" target="_blank">joint memo</a> to their colleagues supporting the plan. They do note that the plan will require subsequent review in the <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Legislature/">Legislature,</a> despite Schwarzenegger&#8217;s insistence that lawmakers consider it on an &#8220;up or down&#8221; vote without any changes.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are confident that the tax package is the right course for <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/California/">California,</a>&#8221; they wrote. &#8220;We also recognize that the BNRT (business net receipts tax) represents an extraordinary change in <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/California/">California&#8217;s</a> tax code. A tax change of this magnitude should only occur after the proposal has been fully vetted and all of its ramifications have been fully assessed by the <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Legislature/">Legislature</a> and the governor and the public.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Other ideas. The commission is still working on a constitutional amendment to create a strong rainy-day fund. Former <a style="cursor: pointer; display: inline; font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-weight: 400; font-style: normal;" rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Democratic+Assemblyman+Fred+Keeley/">Democratic Assemblyman Fred Keeley</a> said his carbon tax proposal remains on the table.</div>
<div class="tradevibes_linkdiv"><a class="tradevibes_show_widget" href="http://www.tradevibes.com/company/profile/c-i-tax">C &amp; I Tax</a></div>
<p><script src="http://widget.tradevibes.com/widget/c-i-tax" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=514</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
