<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>News and Views for the California Enterprise Zones &#187; EZ legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=ez-legislation" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://canditax.com/blog</link>
	<description>From the tax credit experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CAEZ Newsletter</title>
		<link>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=860</link>
		<comments>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=860#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StevenDotan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california tax news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zone Tax Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZ legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canditax.com/blog/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Here is the link to the July edition of the CAEZ newsletter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>Here is the <a href="http://campaign.constantcontact.com/render?v=001PcleU6K0CjgSJyOCGClsd41JtY3Cqaebdly4xfNWTrMvxMX1kbAelL-IzUNFTNE3L3lwdBVzcCndEi3fOdW0mcgIGCT9y5w4arUh99QufOgzNRsar17ejBsWeHOmeO-5">link</a> to the July edition of the CAEZ newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=860</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Walters Latest EZ Piece Milder Than Usual</title>
		<link>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=834</link>
		<comments>http://canditax.com/blog/?p=834#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>StevenDotan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C & I Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Zone Tax Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise zone tax news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZ legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZ tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canditax.com/blog/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Walters, typically very hostile towards Enterprise Zones, issued a short article this morning in which he urges a review of what he considers “all tax loopholes.”  The article notes that LA City Mayor Antonio  Villaraigosa recently took a shot at Senate President Pro Tem Steinberg for authoring SB 974 which seeks to shift EZ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>Walters, typically very hostile towards Enterprise Zones, issued a short <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2010/06/29/2856142/dan-walters-fight-over-californias.html">article</a> this morning in which he urges a review of what he considers “all tax loopholes.”  The article notes that LA City Mayor Antonio  Villaraigosa recently took a shot at Senate President Pro Tem Steinberg for authoring SB 974 which seeks to shift EZ funds to a new high school training program.  The article also notes that Gov. Schwarzenegger recently issued his support for expanded EZs.  In conclusion, Walters merely seeks a wholesale review of all tax “loopholes” rather than the usually vociferous and targeted cry to eliminate specifically the Enterprise Zone program.  This could be seen as recognition that the EZs have strong support from upper levels of government and more importantly, that being able to tout the EZ program has immediate and positive tangible and intangible effects on the business climate and job creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://canditax.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=834</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
